Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Rey

Build With Tech

Public • 10 • Free

🚀 Solve your tech mysteries with free guides and peer support. Join Build With Tech to transform your small business through community power!🚀

Memberships

Content Creator Cashflow

Private • 2k • Free

I ❤️ AI Community

Private • 768 • Free

Skool Community

Public • 133.6k • Paid

The Skool Games

Private • 17.1k • Free

Content Academy

Public • 7.2k • Free

ChatGPT Users

Public • 11.1k • Free

Software Developer Academy

Private • 20.2k • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

Private • 30.5k • Free

Selling Online / Prime Mover

Public • 5.4k • Free

3 contributions to Content Academy
The Multi-AI Approach: Why Settling for One Assistant Limits Your Potential
Since the inception of ChatGPT, I've been using the tool to research, generate content, strategize, and develop products for my company and our clients. Knowing it had a limited range of trained data, I felt that what I used didn't matter because it wasn't changing that often. We were good as long as it was within a year or so. However, as of late, my team and I have been working on other AI tools like Llama, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, and many others. Each one has its differences that impact certain aspects of tooling. For example, Copilot and ChatGPT do great at code-based language. Feed them a user story or requirements similar to one you would put into a Jira or Trello for a developer, and it will crank out usable code. About 80% usable. You'll still need to integrate and deploy it, but if you have any experience in the world of programming, you can get away with a lot. Gemini and ChatGPT do very well at research topics, but Gemini takes the cake when it can cite the sources for its results. It's been accurate at providing that detail, whereas ChatGPT tends to hallucinate a lot if it can't pinpoint the source. Then, there's Llama, which we used for a project that allowed us to create application tools as the source for a chatbot and other apps that relied on real-time responses that seemed conversational. Llama, however, can be replaced by Gemini to provide the same solution. Lastly, Claude is another beast in itself. The thing that makes Claude great is that it is very tuned to marketing and content creation. We've gotten almost human-like text and conversations with every marketing copy or social media script, title, description, and the like. This is why many marketers use Claude to write out their ads, social media copy, scripts for social videos, and more. I find myself increasingly using Claude due to the conversational side of its responses. But, for me, it isn't an all-or-nothing deal. I use ChatGPT to create code, Gemini for intense research, and Copilot within my Integrated Development Environment to help me with code completion when I'm programming.
2
0
Midjourney or Real? (mystery revealed)
Midjourney or real was the question in YESTERDAYS POLL. It was 62 to 50 ( in favor of MJ) But it was a REAL pic = ) I have to admit it looked AI generated (that's why I posted it). Thanks for playing!
26
14
New comment Jul 23
Midjourney or Real? (mystery revealed)
4 likes • Jul 22
[attachment]
Midjourney Or Real? **SOLVED**
Real or MJ? Mystery Solved → RIGHT HERE
Poll
131 members have voted
12
27
New comment Jul 22
Midjourney Or Real? **SOLVED**
2 likes • Jul 21
I feel like it’s flat as far as depth and shadows. So I’m guessing Midjourney.
1-3 of 3
Rey Ortega
2
12points to level up
@rey-ortega-4601
Software Engineer, Architect, and Consultant turned Entrepreneur and Owner. Check out my community at Skool.com/build-with-tech/about

Online now
Joined Jul 12, 2024
INTJ
powered by