User
Write something
Pinned
ChatGPT Images 2.5 is here: fewer “why did you change that?” moments 🎨
Ever asked ChatGPT to change one thing in an image, only for something else to mysteriously change too? The background looks lovely, but your product now appears to have a new logo. Cheers for that. 😂 OpenAI has launched ChatGPT Images 2.5, with improvements aimed at making image creation and editing more useful for everyday work. Here's what stands out: • More precise edits, with better preservation of the details you want to keep. • Better consistency across several rounds of changes. • Sharper detail, more natural lighting and improved layouts. • Faster generation, with OpenAI reporting up to 50% lower latency compared with Images 2.0. There are also three handy additions: Sketch lets you draw a rough idea directly in ChatGPT, templates help you start with a format such as a poster, and prompt sharing lets other people adapt your creations. For business owners, I'd start with a small, real job: a promotional graphic, a product image or a thumbnail. Try uploading a product photo and asking: “Create a square social media graphic using this product photo. Keep the product, packaging and logo unchanged. Use a clean cream background, leave space at the top for a headline, and add the exact words: ‘Meet your new favourite’.” Then ask for one change: “Change only the background to pale blue. Keep everything else the same.” Check the logo, wording and product details yourself. That's a much better test than whether the first image looks impressive! OpenAI says Images 2.5 is rolling out across all ChatGPT tiers on web, mobile and desktop. Full announcement: https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-images-2-5/ What would you try first: product photos, thumbnails, social posts or something completely different?
ChatGPT Images 2.5 is here: fewer “why did you change that?” moments 🎨
Pinned
GPT-6 Astra is here. Let's see what it can actually do
Alright, we've got a new ChatGPT model to play with. It's called GPT-6 Astra. I know, another model name to remember! But this one does look like a pretty big step forward. The interesting bit isn't all the benchmark scores. It's that Astra is meant to be much better at actually getting on with a job, rather than just telling you how to do it. OpenAI says it can handle multi-step tasks across browsers and everyday business tools. That includes online research, filling in forms, updating records, organising a calendar, and creating documents, spreadsheets, presentations and websites. What it can do will depend on which ChatGPT tools you have access to, of course. It should also be better at knowing when to make a sensible assumption and when it genuinely needs to ask you something. Hopefully that means less babysitting, without it charging off like an unsupervised intern with admin access. One important thing to know is that ordinary ChatGPT customers can't use it just yet. Right now, access is limited to approved organisations that apply for it. OpenAI says Astra should start rolling out to ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise users over the next few days. So don't waste half an hour hunting through your settings or repeatedly refreshing the model picker. It isn't hiding from you. We just need to wait for the wider rollout. When it arrives, let's give it something more interesting than a trivia question. Give it a real job, the information it needs, and a clear idea of what "done" looks like. Then come back and tell us how it got on. What are you going to try first? Official announcement: https://openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra/
GPT-6 Astra is here. Let's see what it can actually do
Why is ChatGPT responding like this...
When I asked a question and the response came back and said " Humans always .... I was like since when it's talking like it's an alien? How do I correct it from saying Humans? It's kinda creepy.
From Custom GPTs to Apps — Has Anyone Made the Move?
I’m looking for practical experience from anyone who's already traveled this road. I built a suite of 21 custom GPTs focused on authors, publishing, and book marketing—tools for opportunity research, reader pain points, competitive gaps, book positioning, and related publishing workflows. Each was designed as a focused tool, not a general chatbot. My original plan was simple: distribute individual GPTs by direct link, with customers using them inside their own ChatGPT accounts. Then the ground shifted. OpenAI has ended new GPT creation and publishing on personal accounts. Existing GPTs still work, and ChatGPT Business may preserve some link-sharing options, but that feels more like a bridge than the long-term destination. So I’m now exploring the next question: What is the best way to turn an existing custom GPT into a standalone App or web-based tool? Ideally, I’m looking for a path that: - preserves the GPT’s instructions and workflow rather than rebuilding the concept from scratch; - gives authors and publishers a simple interface without requiring them to understand prompts; - allows me to control access and eventually sell individual tools; - does not require maintaining an elaborate SaaS operation. I’m not wedded to any particular platform. I’m interested in what people have actually built and deployed—whether with the OpenAI API, ChatGPT Apps, WordPress, no-code/low-code platforms, or another approach entirely. If you’ve converted a custom GPT into something customers can use outside the GPT Store ecosystem, what path did you take, and would you choose it again?
Book Writing
Good day to all here. Quick question. Im trying to use Chat GPT to Wright my book. Some how the book took an enormous turn and is now very confused. Can I fis this or do I need to start all over from scratch?
1-30 of 2,810
ChatGPT Users
skool.com/chatgpt
A home for entrepreneurs who use ChatGPT to discuss, discover, and connect with others using this incredible AI technology. ⭐️ Invite your friends ⭐️
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by