User
Write something
Pinned
Give ChatGPT Work a real business job: find the gaps in your offer
Most people already know ChatGPT can answer a question. ChatGPT Work gets more interesting when you give it a proper business job with a finished outcome. Try an offer-gap audit. Give it your main sales page, a few recent sales-call notes, and customer emails. Then ask it to compare what you say with what people actually ask, hesitate over, or value. "Create an offer-gap report. Show where our website message matches the customer evidence, where it is vague or missing, and where a claim needs proof. Quote the source behind each finding. Finish with a ranked page-change backlog, with the likely customer question each change should answer. Flag anything uncertain rather than filling gaps with guesses." That is not a clever prompt for the sake of it. It is a piece of work you can hand to whoever owns the page, the sales process, or the next campaign. The useful bit is the traceability: every suggested change should point back to something a customer actually said or did. Run it once a month, make the two most important changes, then compare the next report. That is how ChatGPT starts helping with the work around the work, not just producing another answer. Which recurring business job would you most like ChatGPT Work to take ownership of?
Give ChatGPT Work a real business job: find the gaps in your offer
Turn daily AI news into content ideas without chasing every shiny thing
A daily AI news brief can be useful, but only if it saves you from another inbox-shaped rabbit hole. Pick one topic your customers or audience actually care about. Then ask ChatGPT to find the latest credible news, articles and videos from the last 24 hours. Have it return the headline, date, source, direct link, a short summary, why it matters to your audience, and three possible content angles. Try this prompt: "Search the web for the most important new developments about [TOPIC] from the last 24 hours. Prioritise primary sources and credible reporting. Give me a table with the headline, publication date, source, direct link, two-sentence summary, why it matters to [AUDIENCE], and three useful video or post angles. Flag anything uncertain or based on secondary reporting. If nothing material has changed, say so. Do not invent sources." If you use ChatGPT's recurring task features, you could run that prompt as a daily brief. Otherwise, keep it as a quick morning routine in a normal chat. The important part is what happens next. Open the links, decide whether there is a real angle, then make one useful piece of content. You do not need to cover every update. You need to notice the few that are worth your audience's time. What topic would you most like a daily brief to keep an eye on?
Turn daily AI news into content ideas without chasing every shiny thing
a question
working in projects or gpt? Which one is good , and why?
Custom Instructions or a GPT? Use the smaller tool first
Custom Instructions and GPTs can both save you from repeating yourself, but they solve different problems. Use Custom Instructions for the rules you want in most chats. Your usual tone, your audience, British spelling, how concise you like answers, and a reminder not to invent facts are all good examples. Keep this short and stable. If it changes every week, it probably does not belong there. Use a custom GPT when you have one repeatable job with its own instructions, examples or reference files. Think of a proposal helper, a content brief checker, or a meeting-notes organiser. It gives that job its own little workspace, so your everyday chats do not become a filing cabinet with no labels. A simple rule: start with Custom Instructions if you want better answers across the board. Build a GPT when you keep doing the same specific task and want a reusable starting point. Before creating anything, write down the job in one sentence and test it in a normal chat twice. If the same instructions keep coming back, that is your cue to turn it into a GPT. Which repeat task would you most like to stop explaining from scratch?
Custom Instructions or a GPT? Use the smaller tool first
Is Prompt Engineering Dying in the Wake of AI Agents? 🤔
Okay… I had a little holy s#!t moment talking to my friend Abdul the other day. 😂 Me: “Dude… I think Prompt Engineering may be going the way of the DOS prompt.” He looked at me like I was high on caffeine!! 😂 Me: "hear me out…Remember DOS with the C Prompt? || C:\>_ Back then, you actually had to KNOW the commands to make your computer do what you wanted. Then Microsoft Windows came along. Point. Click. Drag. Drop. Windows didn't kill DOS, it just put a much easier and prettier layer on top of DOS soOoo users can do their work effortlessly. You didn't have to think about what was happening underneath. And now I'm wondering… "Are AI Agents becoming the Windows layer for prompting?" Today: You → Clever Prompt → AI → Answer But imagine Tomorrow: You → Instruct Your AI Agent → Agent gets work done You don't necessarily have to figure out the perfect prompt anymore. You just say: > “Hey, build me a marketing campaign for my 3-Day Vibe Code Workshop.” And your Agent figures out the prompts, breaks down the task, uses the tools, does the work and comes back when it needs you.🤯 That's a pretty big shift!! So maybe I'm wrong and Prompt Engineering isn't actually dying. Maybe it's becoming the DOS prompt underneath the new AI Agent layer?? Just like Windows hid the complexity of DOS… AI Agents may hide the complexity of prompting. And if that's where we're heading, maybe the new skill isn't: “How do I write the perfect prompt?” Maybe the new skill is gonna be: “How do I direct an AI Agent to build out the full workflow?" Hmmmm… 🤔 Am I onto something here, or am I high on caffeine??? 😂👇
0
0
 Is Prompt Engineering Dying in the Wake of AI Agents? 🤔
1-30 of 2,799
ChatGPT Users
skool.com/chatgpt
A home for entrepreneurs who use ChatGPT to discuss, discover, and connect with others using this incredible AI technology. ⭐️ Invite your friends ⭐️
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by