https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_bmAVBP1IM

Both "creation" and "evolution" are co-utilized by reality. This can be supertautologically verified through sufficient logical induction. i.e. think about this thouroughly enough and it's obvious that both creation and evolution exist and are used by one another to get shit done in the universe. ------------------------------------ Either God created evolution or evolution created God. In either case God -as described in most religions- would be perfectly capable of creating programs of evolution. If only to carry out his will with greater efficiency than he otherwise would if he were to divinely intervene in every single event, of every size, every second, of every minute, throughout the entire universe. It is logical that God would very well implement both evolution, and free will; perscribing both to the life forms through which are created. If only to assist him in shaping reality, and then divinely intervening when or if needed, to keep reality on the path he intends. Free will, mechanism, and evolution, are co-utilized with devine intervention in the operation of reality. All four of these things absolutely exist, they are used together, and they ought not be toiled against one another in this manner that has allowed them to rather bizarrely; split, and to compartmentalize the minds of hundreds of millions of passionate, truth seeking individuals that have been interspersed throughout the droning public -for thousands of years. Religious folk, intellectuals, artists, athletes and warriors; all who are passionate and truth seeking. There is no reason not to mutually open up our minds to one anothers views and values; to potentially realize: that we each hold a peace to the puzzle that lies before us.

Does the non-terminal domain generate the terminal domian? Does the non-terminal domain do this through descriptive endomorphism? ----------------- Bound telesis is simply raw unbound telesis from the non-terminal domain: that has been configured into matter or energy; as it enters the ternimal domain. Correct? Descriptive endomorphism generates particles into space from unbound telesis. Correct? Linear ectomorphism then generates objects such as: atoms, molecules, stars and more -with those particles. Correct? Should the main body of unbound telesis not shrink as more of it becomes bound telesis and generates into particles?

This community is not only a haven for ideas, it is a haven for the proliferation of a new understanding of reality that could, would, and is already in the process of changing the world. As part of that process, you play a role. All of you have something of value to offer. A skill, a knack of some sort that you can conjoin with an understanding of the CTMU to propel it's understanding in the world. It's not enough to read, understand, and agree. You can do that and it would make you pragmatically no different to anyone who believes the exact opposite of CTMU and yet also does nothing about it. We have at our hands a theory that can speak for itself, all that is needed to be done is getting people to listen, and you are needed for that. Attend the classes, speak, make content, respond to the people who counter-signal. Do all that which you can to make CTMU heard and there will come a point where turning a blind eye and pretending that the CTMU is just 'word-salad' won't work anymore because there will be thousands of people like you that understand its true meaning and significance, and we at the Compatriots Academy are ready to equip with what's required for you to be able to do that. Good Luck!

Ever since I can remember, even as a baby; I felt that I've been faced with fundamental issues that no one around me could ever seem to acknowledge properly. Let alone solve, or guide me through with any satisfaction on my part. I feel that as trauma and misfortune pressured me -pushed me further and further into the corner in which these fundamental issues formed- I became quite literally: mentally and emotionally ill. The world was tearing my life apart from the outside-in; while I was tearing -it- apart, from the inside-out. What led me back to the CTMU was actually the following these words from Mike Mentzer and Ayn Rand, which explained the issues I felt within myself as a human being. ----------- "Examples of fundamental issues are: Is the world knowable or is it mysterious and unknowable? Are reason and logic mans sole means of gaining knowledge? Or are our emotions superior means of cognition? Is man a rational efficacious being capable of success and happiness? Or is he a congenital incompetent, doomed to perpetual doubt and despair? Is the struggle to gain knowledge and learn how think for myself worth it? Or is obeying and pleasing others more important? Should I passively accept the dominant cultures values or should I look outside the culture to the grand scale of context of the history of ideas for something better?" -Mike Mentzer -------- "The real role of philosophy is to help a man make choices. As long as man is confronted with choices he is going to need a philosophy." -Mike Mentzer -------- "Your only choice is whether you define your philosophy by a conscious, rational, disciplined process of thought and scrupulously logical deliberation. Or let your let your subconscious accumulate a junk heap of unwarranted conclusions, false generalizations, undefined contradictions, undigested slogans, unidentified doubts, wishes, and fears thrown together by chance; but integrated by your subconscious into a kind of mongrel philosophy, and fused into a single solid weight of self-doubt -like a ball and chain where your mind's wings of confidence should have grown."