Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The CTMU Club

Public • 55 • Free

17 contributions to The CTMU Club
A question about causation
Let's see if I have this down. When Chris points out in his Knowles interview that it can't be as simple as the past causing the future and that "the past and the future must cause EACH OTHER in a loop", is he saying that since the past refers to the future and since you can't refer to something that isn't real, the future's existence is not caused by the past since it has to be assumed to "already" exist? And also that since determinism doesn't work, and you must have freedom in the universe, the future must cause that which causes itself, and this is "meta-causation"?
3
2
New comment 6d ago
1 like • 6d
I would look into "retro-causation" in addition to every other type of causation you can read up on and disseminate. That's gonna help. We know that a present event can determine the "meta-data"(if you will) of past event. In other words, a present event does effect peoples memory and perception of a past event. If time can be traveled through by anything -it'd make sense for information, or particles to be sent backwards through it so that the universe could better self actualize. If time is a loop, then I personally beleive that time istelf as a whole could be functioning as a tool for advanced self actualization. This tools format would be a gargantuan network of cognitvely generated time loops(generated by the G.O.D.) each producing a hyper active array of branching event timelines. From this, the global operator descriptor can pluck one chain of events, and link it to another -until it reaches an optimal model of reality for its terminal domain(our universe, multiverse, or omniverse[whichever of these imperical induction science reveals true])
1 like • 6d
https://youtu.be/gMGR3J90mXY?si=jrbrLu2t2x9HHb_k
Question's about the dualistic nature of the two semi-models.
Does the non-terminal domain generate the terminal domian? Does the non-terminal domain do this through descriptive endomorphism? ----------------- Bound telesis is simply raw unbound telesis from the non-terminal domain: that has been configured into matter or energy; as it enters the ternimal domain. Correct? Descriptive endomorphism generates particles into space from unbound telesis. Correct? Linear ectomorphism then generates objects such as: atoms, molecules, stars and more -with those particles. Correct? Should the main body of unbound telesis not shrink as more of it becomes bound telesis and generates into particles?
3
2
New comment 8d ago
0 likes • 8d
@Omni Azyzz Actually I wasn't clear enough. Thanks for the directions! Now I know where to look in the books. ------------------------ I meant to say that: bound telesis *was* UBT - it becomes bound telesis once it is configured and enters the ternimal domain as a telon. And by: the shrinking of UBT -I ment the quantity of UBT and in tern: the size of the nonterminal domain as a whole. As UBT is configured and generated into the terminal domain, it must result in "less UBT in the non-terminal domain." That's what I ment. Obviously I am assuming that UBT -or God- is finite or limited in some aspect to begin with here. I appriciate the chance to verify my understandings of the CTMU with all of you here. Know that you all guide my studies, and have a positve effect on my life.
Is Telesis finite?
Tommy says "it depends." An excellent answer. Here's what it led me to. Let's say that telesis is infinite in quantity. An unlimited resource. If it is the case that telsis is infinite in quantity -then it must be limited in its availability; by virtue of it's dependence on God's ability to harvest it, and the Devils ability to harness or parasitize it. We must assume that in a sea of unlimited amounts of raw unbound telesis -God's ability to harvest it: is limited, or at risk of becoming inferior to the Devils ability to parasitize it; once it becomes bound telesis within the terminal domain -were the Devil is also bound. If telesis was not limited in this manner or another; then the conflict between God and the Devil would be non-existent. God will not destroy the Devil, becuase the devil is a critical component of the terminal domain that has gone awry - thus the Devil must be reconciled and saved, if the terminal domain is to be saved. So in the hypothetical instance that unbound telesis is infinite in quantity: the conflict between God and the Devil then imparts that God's ability to harvest, utilize, and secure sufficent amounts of unbound telesis to achive his will within the terminal domain; is in question. If God is all knowing, this would not be in question -it would be known fact. And so I think that God is very aware -that: there are more ways to fuck this up; than there are ways to get it right. Yes -God is all knowing, and all powerful- but he is not all controlling. This terminal domain we all reside in is an unprecedented attempt of self actualization. I apriciate this very much. It is my beleif, and I beleive I have attained it through the process of logical induction; applied to the CTMU. This feels quite fitting considering that the CTMU was itself created through logical induction.
3
2
New comment 8d ago
2 likes • 8d
https://youtu.be/gMb4kAdMu_Y?si=JcZLtd_ixSA3h93R Is Telesis finite? - It depends. Tommy elaborates @50:25
Evolution vs. Creation
Both "creation" and "evolution" are co-utilized by reality. This can be supertautologically verified through sufficient logical induction. i.e. think about this thouroughly enough and it's obvious that both creation and evolution exist and are used by one another to get shit done in the universe. ------------------------------------ Either God created evolution or evolution created God. In either case God -as described in most religions- would be perfectly capable of creating programs of evolution. If only to carry out his will with greater efficiency than he otherwise would if he were to divinely intervene in every single event, of every size, every second, of every minute, throughout the entire universe. It is logical that God would very well implement both evolution, and free will; perscribing both to the life forms through which are created. If only to assist him in shaping reality, and then divinely intervening when or if needed, to keep reality on the path he intends. Free will, mechanism, and evolution, are co-utilized with devine intervention in the operation of reality. All four of these things absolutely exist, they are used together, and they ought not be toiled against one another in this manner that has allowed them to rather bizarrely; split, and to compartmentalize the minds of hundreds of millions of passionate, truth seeking individuals that have been interspersed throughout the droning public -for thousands of years. Religious folk, intellectuals, artists, athletes and warriors; all who are passionate and truth seeking. There is no reason not to mutually open up our minds to one anothers views and values; to potentially realize: that we each hold a peace to the puzzle that lies before us.
2
1
New comment 8d ago
Proactivity and your significance in propelling the CTMU
This community is not only a haven for ideas, it is a haven for the proliferation of a new understanding of reality that could, would, and is already in the process of changing the world. As part of that process, you play a role. All of you have something of value to offer. A skill, a knack of some sort that you can conjoin with an understanding of the CTMU to propel it's understanding in the world. It's not enough to read, understand, and agree. You can do that and it would make you pragmatically no different to anyone who believes the exact opposite of CTMU and yet also does nothing about it. We have at our hands a theory that can speak for itself, all that is needed to be done is getting people to listen, and you are needed for that. Attend the classes, speak, make content, respond to the people who counter-signal. Do all that which you can to make CTMU heard and there will come a point where turning a blind eye and pretending that the CTMU is just 'word-salad' won't work anymore because there will be thousands of people like you that understand its true meaning and significance, and we at the Compatriots Academy are ready to equip with what's required for you to be able to do that. Good Luck!
6
2
New comment 12d ago
3 likes • 12d
I can say one thing. Every proponent of the CTMU I have met gives off truly good person energy. We all have good intentions. We are not antisemitic, or racial supremacists. However we must remember that it is our actions that effect the CTMU the most. The subconscious judges by results. Behaviour is more important then beliefs. If a philosophy does not reliably and dependably induce optimal behaviour in which in turn should yeild optimal real world results -it will not and should not be justified. So does the truth always yeild the best results? I think mystics have a tool we can use. Good thing the CTMU can work through a mystical framework too.
1-10 of 17
Ginger Wildcat
3
39points to level up
@ginger-wildcat-3762
Just love studying the universe.

Active 11h ago
Joined Nov 29, 2024
INTJ
New Hampshire
powered by