Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by André

Your laboratory for off-market business experiments. Learn to find under the radar deals, get traffic wholesale & monetize smarter in 2025

Memberships

Money Mavericks

120 members • Free

Web Agency Mastery Community

3.7k members • Free

Investor OPS

136 members • Free

WeScale (Free)

23k members • Free

AchieveGreatness.com (FREE)

4.9k members • Free

Creator Boost Tribe

8.8k members • Free

Bitcoin

1.3k members • Free

Community Builders

8.1k members • Free

Agency Growth

3.9k members • Free

6 contributions to A.I. Royalty Rockstars
The $1k a Day Skool $ales Machine
$1k a day... I’ve been tinkering again. Over the last 18 months... I’ve been using Polls + DM in Skool groups and cranking out $200k plus in small groups of less than 500 members. (No phone calls - no webinars - no VSLs- and selling offers from $500 to $20,000) Averaging well over $1k a day with small Skool communities...with 3 Question Polls! (It’s nearly impossible to do with FB groups.) Plus… It’s so simple I’ve got peeps doing the tapping/selling for me. I've lovingly put it all in a training roadmap for you called 6-Figure Poll Tapping. 👉For a few days, if there's interest, I want you to have it ON ME! 👇Are you considering starting a small Skool community at all?👇
Poll
65 members have voted
1 like • Aug '24
Never too cool for skool!
Social Media Exposure...
If you're trying to get the ball rolling with acquiring distribution or forming partnerships for licensing etc... and the first step of that usually depends on your social media posts or DMs being seen by enough of the right people, but the social media algorithms not giving you enough exposure, how do you overcome or break through that?? So before the problem was the attitude of "buy my shit"... Now the obstacle is "look at my shit". Facebook for example has a big throttle it seems with group posts or DMs getting enough exposure (especially to the right target audience), are there other social media platforms in particular where that isn't an issue ?
1 like • Jul '24
What Travis said! And, another thing Travis also says/teaches is to clone or multiply an audience. In other words, give them an incentive to get on an email list or different platform (clone), or an incentive to promote and grow your audience for you (multiply)
AI web scraper ?
Anybody know of an AI tool that can comb through a list of websites in real time, and extract some research about them for developing personalizations - especially "present pain points", for B2B lead gen?
1 like • Jul '24
This would be a pretty cool tool to have. Did you find anything Basel?
Questions about Licensing (New Money From Old Courses)
I went through the 3 hour 42 minute training and took notes. I've got quite some questions that need clarity, and I'm unsure if I understood them right. Before I post them away, is this the right place to ask? After all, I got in F.O.C. Thanks! P.S. heads up, some of the questions might sound dumb. EDIT: updating the Post with the bunch of Qs below: Context: I've created a ton of Courses and Digital Products over the years. To narrow things down, right now I've got: A. A webinar that I sell my paid Course "how to create and sell your own Info Products" aimed at complete beginners B. An Online Course on Facebook Ads - originally made for B2B and offline business owners Here are my questions: 1. You recommend seeking out people in N.E.E.R. (Naturally Existing Economic Relationship) - that can be existing Customers on email list, or even people in our immediate social network. But where I'm in - most people are also vendors on JVZoo, WarriorPlus, etc. thus are used to the Launch and Affiliate Marketing model. Why would they agree to a Licensing deal, when they can just be an Affiliate? From the sound of it, it seems no different than me seeking JV Partners for my launches last time. 2. Also, most of my Customers, or rather most people are newbies thus don't have a strong "Distribution Center" themselves i.e. mailing list. Doesn't this mean most of them won't be a fit for this particular Licensing arrangement? 3. Let's see if I understood this part right: (a) We're NOT charging the Licensee for anything upfront? Instead, he or she sells, and I take a cut e.g. 25% royalty (or whatever we agree upon) (b) The Licensee processes payments through THEIR payment processor? (c) And if yes, how would *I* track so it doesn't lead to trust issues? (d) And what if the Licensee isn't savvy enough to create this payment process and method? While I can offer to setup, it sounds like extra work that goes against the idea of 'less hassles'? (e) What about who gets to keep the list?
5 likes • Jul '24
Hey Edmund, these are a lot of Q’s LOL! And some of them are pretty loaded. But I’ll post some answers that come to mind for me.. Wanted to shoot you a quick video, but I'm pretty sure I would lose my train of thought... 1. With Q1 - When you ask why these folks on affiliate platforms would agree to licensing, are you asking because those are the folks you want to do deals with? Either way I can see why licensing would be more attractive VS a standard affiliate offer. For one, licensing is way more flexible - most affiliate guys or sellers are not able to negotiate/build a deal with others, everything is pretty fixed. With licensing, you make the rules. Some examples in my other answers. 2. How do you know most of your folks don’t have distribution? Have you asked them? Obviously there would be little sense in setting up deals with folks who can’t add value, but you might be surprised how many folks might make good partners if you just asked. 3. Let's see if I understood this part right: (a) We're NOT charging the Licensee for anything upfront? Instead, he or she sells, and I take a cut e.g. 25% royalty (or whatever we agree upon) - Exactly, whatever you agree upon. You can literally structure it however you like it or however much you want to accommodate the other person. (b) The Licensee processes payments through THEIR payment processor? Probably better to process on your end, then pay their share after. Also might depend on the deal. Typically the person taking the most risk calls the shots. So if you are asking them to run ads, or do all the work and take a bunch of risk to sell your stuff, then probably better to let them take the payment. On the other hand, if for example you are offering to run the promo, take all the risk, get the leads from their list, pre-sell the leads etc, that gives you a lot more leverage since you are taking most of the risk. - Another thing you can only do with licensing. (c) And if yes, how would *I* track so it doesn't lead to trust issues?
👀Close the sale in 1/4 the time and have them thank you!
One way to shorten your sales calls and cycles + have people thank you at the same time! Don’t try to sell them on a new concept… That takes a long ass time… 👉Sell them something they are already PRE-SOLD on… Unless you sell to Monks… You can bet your people are already pre-sold on being respected, admired and loved by other people…even to strangers. Show them how they can get that with you and watch “I’m ins” come in so fast your head spins. They will thank you and tell their friends too😊 Rooting For Ya, Travis PS For more ways to get people to beg to buy from you - get my book - give copies to all your sales peeps and employees... Just search "Travis Sago" on Amazon or gently press HERE
8 likes • Jul '24
The book is SOOOO GOOD! I will definitely be buying many as gifts for my peeps! I’ve literally not read a more useful book in my life! I‘m implementing the last chapter on driving all the visitors and leads you’ll ever need right now. And I already have a few convo‘s going with prospective partners! Thank you for sharing such an amazing gift with your peeps Travis!
1-6 of 6
André Hallaby
3
43points to level up
@andre-hallaby-9656
I find new money in your old leads & low ticket buyers - creating bolt-on backend revenue. Just send me a cut AFTER new sales hit your account.

Active 12h ago
Joined Feb 16, 2024
Powered by