8d ago in Product Question
Why new algorithm ranks abandoned groups higher now?
I’m all for helping more groups get discovered, but can someone please explain to me why the new discovery algorithm ranks an abandoned group like “B2B Scale” higher than “Accelerator University”?
#200 - B2B Scale → https://www.skool.com/scale-your-b2b-company-3858/about
#221 - Accelerator University → https://www.skool.com/acceleratoruniversity
(See attachments.)
“B2B Scale” vs. “Accelerator University”
Status → "Private" vs. "Public"
Members → 46 vs. 7,470
Online → 1 vs. 130
Ranks → #200 vs. #221
“B2B Scale” has 46 members, and only 1 is online, yet it is ranked #200 by the new algorithm.
In addition, the creator of “B2B Scale” hasn’t even been active and last posted in May 2024.
In comparison, my group, “Accelerator University,” is one of the most active groups on Skool.
We have 7,470 members and 130 are online now. I’ve been highly active for the last 9 months.
One of my latest post has 61 comments and 53 likes. I’m creating quality content and connections.
If this new algorithm is supposed to reward retention on Skool, then something seems wrong.
55
50 comments
Comments are turned off for this post
Why new algorithm ranks abandoned groups higher now?
skool.com/community
Let's collaborate to make Skool better. Share your feedback!
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
🔥
+3676
2
+2408
3
🔥
+2302
4
🔥
+2147
5
🔥
+2015
powered by