Feel like there's an opportunity to learn and improve Skool's Leaderboard / Metrics system.
Hormozi posting last week is a good example of what' should and shouldn't be evaluated.
There's people in here everyday like who contribute a wealth of knowledge to a community. Alex Hormozi came in 5 days ago with a simple "New to Skool. Who dis?" and he's now ranking #1 bumping Ted down.
I know the metric being evaluated is purely likes but... when surfacing a leaderboard and real contributors to a community shouldn't we evaluate deeper metrics across the board? To identify real contributing members?
I.e.
- Days logged in
- Daily Activity
- Comment Replies
- % of Classroom completed
- DM's replied to
This isn't a negative towards Hormozi, he's just introducing himself and it's valuable to some. But I would wager from a communities perspective and a community owners perspective, Ted should be #1 and Hormozi should be bumped to 3rd based off core Skool data points.