Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Tim

Faith Flex

Public • 47 • $10/m

Uncover the origins of your faith! Join our diverse community. Explore ancient history, archaeology, and faith traditions. Engage with experts.

Memberships

Kingdom University

Private • 781 • Free

Skool Masterclass (Free)

Private • 89.8k • Free

Skool Community

Public • 191.7k • Paid

The Skool Games

Private • 18.3k • Free

KINGDOM BUSINESS👑

Private • 44 • $99/m

51 contributions to Faith Flex
Poll
1 John 4:1 gives us a very important task and it's important to understand the context of the solution it presents. THE TASK: "1 Dear friends, do not believe everyone who claims to speak by the Spirit. You must test them to see if the spirit they have comes from God. For there are many false prophets in the world." THE SOLUTION: "2 This is how we know if they have the Spirit of God: If a person claiming to be a prophet acknowledges that Jesus Christ came in a real body, that person has the Spirit of God. 3 But if someone claims to be a prophet and does not acknowledge the truth about Jesus, that person is not from God. Such a person has the spirit of the Antichrist, which you heard is coming into the world and indeed is already here." This passage specifically calls out prophets. But let's say it applies to anyone who is "prophetic". Is this the ONLY test? Choose below the most RELIABLE source for testing them OTHER THAN if they can confess Yeshua/Jesus came in the Flesh. The context of this passage was aimed at the Gnostics who taught Adoptionism and what is now called the Christ Principle. Both are doctrines current making a very popular reappearance. So what if someone is NOT a Gnostic, but has shown tendencies toward the "prophetic". Choose which answer below is the most reliable means of testing the spirit they are prophesying from.
Poll
7 members have voted
3
7
New comment 9h ago
0 likes • 1d
@Tony Pino @Jason Karrer @Germaine Scott @Sarah Galan denicolo @Daniel Marsh Just notifying you of the request made a few days ago 👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼. If you're willing, I'd love to know your thoughts as explained in that request.
0 likes • 11h
@Tony Pino so then how does this perspective specifically lend itself to how you voted?
Clarification About Posting in this Community
Hi All, I want to clarify how this Community is intended to work. Anyone is free to post a comment to begin a thread in the General Discussion Category. I do ask that it remains relevant to the trending conversations started by Admins. No Sacred Named Debates, No Chosen Holiday Bashing (conversations are fine). Classrooms and some Categories are locked only for Moderators and Admin's to post to. Please do not try to post about those categories using the General Discussions category. That will be seen as a circumvention of the Community Rules. Please keep in mind that Skool is an educational site and our particular Community is custom-suited to bring Christians, Hebrew Roots, and Messianics TOGETHER. It is not supposed to be like other Social Media platforms. No one will get away with monopolizing conversations, or spreading divisive information. That does not mean that no one can disagree, it means that when someone does disagree they should follow the RULES that are posted and pinned. This Community needs to remain focused. As education needs present themselves, we will address them by adding more Communities focused on those OR I will open a Classroom for it. Simply put, this isn't Facebook or Threads. It's not a virtual gathering place for social purposes. It is for learning and contributing to the learning of others. You'll see that in most Classrooms there is a thread at the bottom of every lesson. You will also find those on the Dashboard page. This is so your comments can be made immediately after going through a lesson within a Class/Course. This will keep them focused and relevant as per the purpose of the Community. If you have something you'd like to discuss you can open a discussion in the General Discussions Category. But there will be times that I will interject and post that it's not the appropriate place to discuss that particular topic. It's not personal. It just doesn't fit with this Community for any number of possible reasons, such as: I am planning a Community focused on that topic, it is an potentially explosive topic, I see contention starting to rise in the thread, there are too many just posting to share their perspective and not actually engaging on the topic. Remember, the POINT is to engage, discuss, and explore one another's perspectives. Not to "one up" each other and dominate a conversation with 5 comments before anyone has time to even read/research/reply to one.
2
0
Hebrew Revelation, James, and Jude in English
If you're a student of the End Times, you will want to add this manuscript to your library and be sure to consult it as you study the timeline of events. HERE
1
0
Hebrew Mark
Found in a Vatican "junk box" the Sephardic Catalan Gospel of Mark, like Matthew, may very well prove the Gospels did indeed start in Hebrew. Not just because there are many Hebrewisms that "bled" through into English from the Greek manuscripts, but also because the Hebrew Mark solved a number of contradictions within the Greek manuscripts of the "New Testament". Among those, the Greek Mark claims the Gospel begins in the 1st Century while the book of Hebrews claims the Gospel began in the Wilderness with the Israelis. So which is it? Revelation says the Gospel is eternal (implying past and future)!! Christian scholars have spent volumes of books trying to explain the mental gymnastics they have done to make their Antinomian beliefs somehow fit the idea that the Gospel began in the 1st Century. But the Hebrew Mark solves all of that with ZERO justifications or mental gymnastics required. In life, the simplest solution tends to be the correct one. In matters of eternity, those which do not require human explanation tend to be the correct solutions. Hebrew Mark may very well prove to be the most important of them all because of the contradictions it resolves that were created by the Greek Manuscripts. Enjoy!! Find it HERE
1
1
New comment 2d ago
Mathew in Hebrew (Translated to English)
Comparing this to your favorite English version will help you see that Matthew really was likely to have been written originally in Hebrew. A number of colloquialisms and idioms (not to mention Hebrew word puns) bled through into Greek and then into English. But, by tracing those backward into Hebrew, then straight to English, you'll get a more direct understanding of the Hebrew. Greek doesn't always convey the same thing in all circumstances and therefore most of our English versions lack the true context of Mathew's perspective as a 1st Century Hebrew speaker. Check it out HERE
2
1
New comment 5d ago
0 likes • 5d
In one of our FB groups someone rightly brought up the fact that most translations that claim to be a Hebrew Matthew say the same thing(s), in many passages, as those English versions translated from Greek. This Hebrew Matthew does not. Mathew 23:2&3 is a prime example. The NKJV says: 2saying: “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. 3“Therefore whatever they tell you to observe,fn that observe and do, but do not do according to their works; for they say, and do not do. The version I posted doesn't say that. It begins with "It is said", and it probably was said. The infallibility of the Torah Teachers (rabbis) was a well established doctrine in this stage of Judaism. So the people were told to do all the rabbis say. But don't forget the next statement, "DON'T DO AS THEY DO". It reads like this "It is said, do all the Scribes and Pharisees say. But, don't do as they do..." As I've said before and will say many more times, while the NLT gets it wrong about as often as any other modern translation, when it gets it right, it is spot on. Here is its version: 2“The teachers of religious law and the Pharisees are the official interpreters of the law of Moses. 3So practice and obey whatever they tell you, but don’t follow their example. For they don’t practice what they teach. In the case of verse 2, it is WAY OFF. There was an actual thing as The Seat of Moses. It was where a prominent rabbi would sit when establishing a takkanot, a rabbinic law added to Torah that was taught as if equal to Torah OR as if it was Torah. But verse 3 is pretty much spot on. Messiah affirmed the rabbis were Torah Experts, but He also called them out for not living what they preached.
1-10 of 51
Tim Hillis
5
267points to level up
@tim-hillis-2585
A published researcher of 1st Century Theology & Doctrine, Tim's voice is a clarion call to reach churched & unchurched alike with real & raw Bible.

Active 11h ago
Joined Oct 16, 2024
powered by