Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Learn Microsoft Fabric

Public โ€ข 5.5k โ€ข Free

7 contributions to Learn Microsoft Fabric
Autosave Failing
Anyone noticing that when working in Pipelines, maybe other places as well, the autosaves don't work well. Had a couple times now I lost changes and today lost an hour of work. Do I really have to leave the page every couple of minutes to be gentle with autosave. Or does the Fabric portal favor certain browsers? To be clear you save changes in a pipeline with save, but while you are building something and go away from your screen or check another tab for info etc. and then on return the tab has lost the changes you made so you can't save them anymore. So back to old skool habits, save very regularly.
1
1
New comment 8d ago
SOLVED : Named pipes <> TCP/IP
Hi all, I'm setting up a 'Dataflow Gen2' from an on prem sql to a WH in fabric. I can get my queries from the local DB, but when I want to configure a data destination, I get this error the moment I want to create the destination table. The error says it wants to connect to the server through named pipes, but named pipes is not enabled on the server. I don't manage the server, so I don't know why it is not enabled and if the managing party want to enable it. Is there a way to use TCP/IP for this? TCP/IP worked in the first step, so why not here....?
3
8
New comment 13d ago
SOLVED : Named pipes <> TCP/IP
2 likes โ€ข 13d
Be aware that Fabric has multiple URL's to enter, so port 1433 needs to be open on multiple of them, you notice this when running SSMS / ADS on prem sitting behind a corporate firewall instead of working from home. Microsoft has a support page for this.
TMDL Editor in Visual Studio Code
And now the fun really begins: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZgoV_FHRmk TMDL, tabular editor, DevOps, project based instead pibx, Visual Studio Code, 2025 will be fun :-)
6
1
New comment 13d ago
TMDL Editor in Visual Studio Code
Wohhh ๐Ÿ‘€
I spy with my little eye...
31
20
New comment 3h ago
Wohhh ๐Ÿ‘€
3 likes โ€ข 16d
if it is unfinished as current deployment pipelines (DP), I say keep it and cover first your base before moving on, at least take care that automatic binding isn't auto and could be FULLY parameter driven. Lots of folks using DFG2 would then happily also test this to, like me!
1 like โ€ข 16d
@Will Needham Thx for asking! Having different data streams from separate Service Bus queues for the Dev / Sta / Prd, I need to be able to make sure that pipelines and semantic models have bindings to the proper data sources. Likewise ADF I expected parameters to handle this. I am aware you can go the proxy route or hack beneath the given current gui, but it is ugly and it feels like the auto binding behavior is more a temporary bandage than a given solution. So don't get me wrong I am not bad mouthing here, else I would have waited for a year longer with already moving from ADF to Fabric. Nevertheless now it's just a very simple Bronze/Silver/Gold implementation. In short we are first going to test with hardcoding the source and there use variables which are tied to the parameters we do have available in the dev pipelines and take it from there until we have proven solutions for all our adventures on the road to implement the architecture we have in mind for our needs and wishes ;-)
Direct Lake mode - change "source lakehouse" of semantic model
I have the following situation: We built up a PoC, which was very successfull and now i would like to switch to productive mode. Therefore, I want to "migrate" into different workspaces. This means I have a Productive workspace, where the user will get access to the report. So far so good, I can use deployment pipeline to copy lakehouse, semantic model and report. But the problem is, that the semanctic model is still related to the "old" lakehouse in my development workspace. Now I would like to change the "source lakehouse" of the semantic model but I have found no solution so far. Does anybody have an idea or even experience with this situation?
1
4
New comment 20d ago
5 likes โ€ข 21d
You might want to have a look here: https://data-mozart.com/migrate-existing-power-bi-semantic-models-to-direct-lake-a-step-by-step-guide/
1-7 of 7
Arjan Van Buijtene
3
41points to level up
@arjan-van-buijtene-8328
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/arjan-van-buijtene-009537/

Active 8d ago
Joined Aug 15, 2024
powered by