The CTMU Club is a free private community for my YouTube channel to discuss the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU). Our platform has free introductory courses in the CTMU and teleological self-development that will help you become the best version of yourself and learn the CTMU in record time with a focused community of like-minded friends and peers. I will make daily posts providing free CTMU education delivered to your inbox weekly in short, digestible bites. I will respond to comments, answer questions, and help support and grow our community. I hope that this community will serve as a platform for incredible personal growth and CTMU education, and I can't wait to see what you contribute! Comment below on how you learned about CTMU and what you are most looking forward to in this community. 👇

This may be the first part of a series of discussions on how Chris Langan's theory of everything, Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe, can save the world from the parasitic overclass. HELP Today (July 7, 2024) was the closing ceremony of a larger 4-day vision quest ceremony held in the Lakota tradition by what I'll have to describe here as a group of mostly white people who mostly live in Richmond, VA and Washington DC. They apparently received a lineage from Lakota people that came through an indigenous man (not Lakota) and his wife. I don't want to talk to much about how this works out. Point is my cousin invited me to this community some 11 years ago and I've always appreciated it, at least for the fact that it's an amazing retreat to an incredible piece of land enveloped in an overflowing bouquet of lush forestry set on the rolling hills of remote Green Sulphur Springs, West Virginia. I mean the natural beauty here is nothing short of idyllic. I'll attach some photos for reference. Anyway, we're all sitting around a feast to punctuate the ceremony and the topic of politics comes up. Suffice to say, the incoherent noise of pseudo-intellectual democrat talking points fills the air to the point where I simply must walk away to the valley below. I get out my phone and thumb through Chris Langan's Substack articles and I begin to face the facts. Either the "matriarch" of this community is correct about resurgent white supremacy, or the man with an IQ beyond Einstein's is right about white genocide. 1 or 0. Yes or no. Either I'm correct in my intuitions and political leanings, about the censorship of the truth, the parasitic overclass, and their puppet Joe Biden, or this lady's right about Trump being the 70 IQ second coming of Hitler (and that makes me something of a sympathizer, even though I'm not exactly waving a Trump flag right now). (Honestly considering writing in Chris Langan) So I walk away considering how there can be no middle ground here, which would mean I may be the only person of the 50 present who has any true grasp of what's really going on in the political sphere, even though I haven't been paying a lot of attention to it lately. And then it hits me.

When God is argued to be, or simply described as being, omnibenevolent and all-loving, atheists sometimes respond that such a being cannot be the God of the Old Testament, because of occasions on which He has commissioned the killing of human beings. The typical examples mentioned are when God flooded the world sparing only Noah and his family, God’s instruction to the Israelites to genocide the Canaanites, and when God “sent 2 bears to merc a bunch of kids for mocking a bald guy” (as it was put to me). This topic is a special favourite among anti-theists, which, owing to the inherent difficulty in resolving the paradox between being all-loving and commissioning murder, has stopped many a Christian apologist in his tracks. It becomes more difficult to address still, when we include the “Thou shalt not kill” commandment in the analysis. I’ve heard many people remark on the difference in character of the God in the Old and New Testaments, and I even heard a Christian on a call-in show mention outright he “doesn’t do” the Old Testament; I suspect this is why. There is, therefore, a considerable bounty on providing a way to resolve these apparent inconsistencies, so that Christians get the upper hand in the debate. One way to explain the difference in God’s character between the OT and the NT would be that omnibenevolence is the property of a function by which God always strives toward a certain goal, but which can appear (if the whole system and its outcomes aren’t considered) to take non-benevolent courses of action when circumstances aren’t optimal. This is rational: someone’s reply to us is conditional on what we have just asked them, as well as on our behavior up until now. Different replies don’t imply an inconsistency in that person’s principles. A person can hold themselves to a standard, yet still behave differently in response to different stimuli while doing so. But why can’t God, in His omnipotence and omnibenevolence, just make life as spiritually-easy as possible for all human societies? And regarding the Genesis flood, the Canaanite slaughter and the 42 “kids” getting merc’d by 2 bears, why can’t God refrain from taking human life in all situations, in order to have an impeccable record?

The Daily Wire has established itself as the premier representation of American conservatism in the past decade, alongside the process of this facade it has put up to the public, primarily to conservative Christians and right-wingers of other political denominations, they have acted as a trojan horse endowed with a false motto of "seeking truth and discussion in the free market-place of ideas" whilst conveniently shutting down any conversation that is to the right of their established political ideology which almost all of their pundits agree on in unison (or at least none of them deviate from publicly in any shape, way or form), and instead have brought into political discourse an attempted establishment of a new political norm which alienates any discourse that doesn't fall in line with complete submission to their ideology (ironically enough, in a way which resembles very fascistic parameters set on what opinions are accepted). I was inspired to make this post because I see this group, community, and movement as a breath of fresh air from mundane political conversation and I see potential in it to grow to replace dogmatic media organizations like The Daily Wire, but also a primary motivator was the sheer amount of hypocrisy, misbehavior, and unjust treatment organizations like The Daily Wire omit towards true conservatism. It has become too apparent a pattern to handwave as sheer happen-stance. We see this with what they did with @Chris Langan's interview, wasting his time and not even publishing the interview, and this is not even the worst of it. In 2016, The Daily Wire employee Kassy Akiva (Kassy Dillon formerly, before her apostatizing from Christianity to Judaism) was scouting for future pundits and writers for The Daily Wire on college campuses. In a college debate she attended that happened to go viral at the time, there was now-famous political commentator Nick Fuentes debating, an 18 year old novice in politics whom happened to be very charismatic and adept in debate. She was very impressed by his performance and reached out to her boss Ben Shapiro (co-founder of The Daily Wire and one of the most influential right-wing political commentators) and they planned to hire him into The Daily Wire as a writer. That was until the 18 year-old made a tweet asking why nobody at The Daily Wire has ever had any criticism of all the foreign aid the United States gives to Israel considering the fact that the right-wing is supposed to be 'America First', to which Ben Shapiro responded, "Accusing any American Jew who is pro-Israel of being an Israel Firster is a pure form of anti-Semitism". Subsequently, Nick's opportunity of working at The Daily Wire, the supposed haven of free speech and the 'free market-place of ideas' for the right, was immediately retracted.

I'm concerned with the future of Christianity. Christianity is riven by all sorts of doctrinal quibbles ranging from troublesome to meaningless. If Christianity is to survive, its logical consistency must be inarguable. It follows that the main problem for Christianity is the refusal of so-called "Christians" to embrace a unified metaphysical framework in which scripture can be consistently interpreted. They're killing their own (professed) religion, which implies that they're not really Christians at all, but enemies of Christ. In confirmation of this implication, self-styled "Christians" have fallen into all manner of iniquity, supporting Mammonism, Godless Marxism, all manner of sexual deviance, and multiculturalism clearly designed to dilute the influence of Christianity in Europe and North America. Many are even actively facilitating the illegal mass migration of millions of unvetted, unassimilable, and criminally inclined aliens across the borders of Western nations on the pretext that this is "what Jesus wants". One of the consequences is a veritable plague of Western Civilization: the rapid injection of atheism, Islamic fundamentalism, and even Haitian Voodoo into formerly Christian societies. The allegedly orthodox opinion that "Satan = Lucifer" (up to functional equivalence) is logically unsubstantiated and superficially untenable given the status of Lucifer as a "fallen angel". [See "CTMU: The Christian-Theoretic Model of the Universe?" below.] It is possible to merge these concepts, but only in a framework that lets the properties of one be consistently translated into those of the other. Unfortunately, that's precisely the model of which certain "Christians", whose minds are closed to metaphysical logic but open to wickedness, are either oblivious or suppressive, and it's an operation that I can handle without their confused input. The survivial of Christianity is at stake, and correct prioritization is necessary in order to save it. Distraction and diversion are not our friends, but our enemies. Let's keep our eyes on the ball instead of playing idiotic games with the illogical model-free labeling of metaphysical concepts.