Seesaw-ish Bipartisan uproar on votinging insecurity.

I've said since 2020 that this would happen.

There's going to be investigations every time now. Until people realize that they don't know how to make it secure, and should find out how, and do so. There are 2 ways. I wrote about them to congress.

One problem is very few people who know how to secure it are not guaranteed an advantage for their canidate. In intelligence agencies everyone benetfits from secure systems because they won't be found and killed. So it's implemented.

There's a lot of claims about 2020 that this article is not addressing. The whole point the activists photographed the Dominon machine software before, and after Dominons unecessary updates was done in late 2020, AFTER Trump already won in 2016, and way before it looked like he was heading for a loose in 2020. That makes it pretty clear the acvtivists intentions in 2020 were to audit the software. Not cheat with it. Because they audited it right before voting in 2020, and would have had mere days to rewrite and manually install it to every voting station. Access to the machines hardware ports are guarded. You need inside people at every station you wish to flip. The whole point was to show that Dominon had that. Dominon can put whatever it wants into those machines and always could.

Dominon would have months to do this and that's the whole point. They claim Dominon was installing updates that allow them to flip votes. Where as the original software before the updates was clean. Idk if you can find that up on github or not.

This article does not even mention the claim of the original activist, or the woman they put in prison for it. And I know why. Because its a compelling story that calls for making voting actually secure. Not recounting. Ofcourse trumps campaign called for recount after that shit. Every campaign will probably call for a recount now that the public is catching on. Recount was always stupid because it wont reverse a cheat.

HERE's the problem. As I said. THIS will happen UNTIL "Analog OTP, and or E-block chain." is implemented for voting. Analog OTP could have been implemented in 1880 AD

-------

------------

Elections are still not secure.

Elections cannot ever, and will not ever: be truly secure, until they utilize electronic block-chian; or analog one-time pad systems. Otherwise nothing stops all elections in history, and future, from being potentialy nothing grater: then a race of cheating, interference, and flukery. Nothing can prevent fruad, interference, or accusations of fraud; unless analog OTP, or E-block chain is implemented.

The situation is mathematically: as simple as that. Analog OTP and electronic block-chian systems have proven since 1880 AD, and 1990 AD respectively; to be mathematically pure, and physically infallible. They cannot be broken, hacked, or dechiphered by; even infinite amounts of: classical Turing, quantum-annealing, or quantum-boolean computing power.

This dismisses Dr. Muchio Kaku's promulgation of the myth that: "quantum will break all the worlds encryption". As Dr. Kaku has remained ignorant of OTP encryption history; and its respective fundamental and applied mathematics. Dr. Kaku has never mentioned or acknowledged OTP encryption. This is very improper; as he has left the discrepancy unaddressed thus far.

This does not denote much of my respect and endearment for the man. I simply cannot agree on this specific popular claim of Dr. Kaku's about quantum, in the face of the facts presented.

Both quantum and AI can, and likely will however: if we do not implement OTP or blockchian; wreak unprecedented havoc on elections in the near future. Thus it is critical to the survival and further evolution of democracy, that we do implement analog OTP, and or electronic block-chain; and make elections truly secure, and fruad-proof: once and for all.

----------

Yes. Everyone can cheat. When they get the upper hand of resources their cheating can win.

Logical systems, and the bravery to use them cannot be cheated.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Codeb…

0 comments