Google + AI -NotebookLM vs. Code Interpreter

So, I finally gave Google's NotebookLM a whirl this weekend. You know I've been kinda meh about Google's AI stuff up till now, but hey, it looks like we're heading into an AI arms race, right? I've always leaned towards Google over Microsoft (especially with their OpenAI tie-up), but bouncing between the two was a pain. So, I thought, why not give NotebookLM a shot?

I've been wrestling with some really complex PDFs for work, stuff that involves extracting data with GPTs. Normally, it's a headache with all the OCR and encoding issues. But NotebookLM? It just got it. No need to mess around exporting to text files or anything. It handled large files like a champ – no bogging down or going off on weird tangents like GPT sometimes does.

And the speed – wow. I put it head-to-head with Code Interpreter, and NotebookLM was just zipping through the files. Sure, there were a few hiccups here and there, but the overall accuracy was spot on.

Honestly, I've tried a bunch of these "talk to PDFs" tools, and NotebookLM is the first one that's really impressed me. If you're dealing with a lot of data extraction like I am, you've got to try it out. Let me know what you think if you do!

Compiled GPT review that I wrote:

Your Experience with NotebookLM:

Superiority to ChatGPT and OpenAI Products: You found NotebookLM superior in handling complex PDF reporting, especially for educational work. It's notable that you experienced fewer hallucinations and bog-downs with large files compared to other AI models.
Efficient Data Extraction: Your specific use case involved extracting data from PDFs using a certain algorithm, where NotebookLM outperformed your expectations. This is a significant point, considering the challenges with OCR and encoding in such tasks.
Speed and Accuracy: You noted that NotebookLM was faster and more accurate in processing files than other AI tools you have used, which highlights its efficiency in managing large volumes of data.
User Experience: Although you encountered errors, the overall return on information was impressive, which suggests a positive user experience.

Insights from Online Sources:

AI Grounding on Uploaded Documents: NotebookLM focuses on using the information in the documents you upload, prioritizing data over creativity. This approach might explain why you found it more accurate and less prone to errors compared to other AI tools.
Early Development Stage: It's important to note that NotebookLM is still in early development, suggesting that improvements and additional features are likely in the future. Users need to join a waitlist to access it, indicating its experimental nature.
Support for Various Formats: The platform supports Google Docs, PDFs, and copied text, but updates in source documents are not automatically reflected in NotebookLM. This requires careful management of source data.
Exploring Data and Connecting Information: NotebookLM excels in exploring data from documents and connecting information from multiple sources, which aligns with your experience of efficient data extraction.
Collaboration Features: The platform allows sharing of notebooks with others, enabling collaboration and interactive engagement with the stored data.
Comparison with Other Tools: While NotebookLM joins a landscape of AI applications, its unique approach to grounding AI responses in user-uploaded documents sets it apart. Alternatives like Claude by Anthropic offer different features, like a larger context window for conversation tracking.

Conclusion: Google's NotebookLM, as per your experience and corroborated by online information, stands out in its ability to efficiently process and extract data from documents, particularly PDFs. Its focus on using uploaded documents as the primary source of information, as opposed to relying heavily on training data, seems to be a key factor in its superior performance in specific tasks like data extraction from complex reports. While it is still in early development, NotebookLM shows promise as a valuable tool in the AI suite, especially for users who seek accurate data handling and extraction from various document formats. The ability to share notebooks for collaborative work further enhances its utility. However, the need to manage source data carefully and the app's current limitations in reflecting updates in source documents are aspects to consider. The AI landscape is indeed becoming competitive, and NotebookLM is a noteworthy entrant in this evolving field.

1 comment