Discussion: How can we combine the different approaches

May 26 (edited) in 🗣️ Network Conversations

Being active in different groups and approaches like biomimicry, ecopsychology, systemic thinking, and regenerative thinking, I am wondering how we could combine our initiatives and become more efficient in our activities. We often have the same objective: solving the current environmental crisis and improving conditions for humanity and the environment at large. I feel that we are often working parallel to each other, but not with each other. There is, of course, some interdisciplinary interaction, but is this happening enough?

I feel an increasing desire to try to connect the dots, uniting all our activities into one powerful movement.

I am still rather new to many of these different schools of thought and not well-connected enough to be aware of all the activities that are ongoing.

I would like to initiate a deeper discussion on the matter. If anyone has ideas or different insights, please share them here.

Below is an AI generated comparisson of the different approaches:

Biomimicry, regenerative thinking, systemic thinking, and ecopsychology share several commonalities, primarily revolving around their approaches to understanding and interacting with the natural world. Here are the main connections:

1. Holistic Perspective:

-Systemic Thinking: Emphasizes understanding the interconnections within systems, viewing the whole rather than just individual parts.

- Ecopsychology: Focuses on the interdependence between human beings and the natural environment, promoting mental health through a connection with nature.

- Biomimicry: Studies nature's designs and processes to inspire sustainable solutions, seeing nature as an interconnected system with lessons to teach.

- Regenerative Thinking: Aims to create systems that restore, renew, or revitalize their own sources of energy and materials, considering the entire ecosystem in its approach.

2. Sustainability and Resilience:

- All four approaches advocate for sustainable practices that do not deplete resources but instead promote resilience and long-term health of ecosystems and human societies.

3. Nature as a Model and Mentor:

- Biomimicry: Directly learns from and mimics the strategies found in nature to solve human problems.

- Regenerative Thinking: Seeks to align human activities with natural regenerative processes.

- Systemic Thinking: Often draws on natural systems as a metaphor for understanding human-made systems and improving their functionality.

- Ecopsychology: Encourages seeing nature as a guide and healer, fostering a deep connection and respect for natural processes.

4. Interdisciplinary Approach:

- Each of these fields integrates knowledge from various disciplines (ecology, psychology, engineering, economics, etc.) to develop comprehensive solutions to complex problems.

5. Focus on Relationships and Interconnections:

- They all emphasize the importance of relationships—whether it's the relationship between humans and nature (ecopsychology), the interdependence of system components (systemic thinking), the integration of human systems into natural regenerative cycles (regenerative thinking), or the inspiration drawn from natural relationships and processes (biomimicry).

6. Promotion of a Paradigm Shift:

- These approaches collectively advocate for a shift in how we think about and interact with the world—from viewing nature as a resource to be exploited to seeing it as a complex, interdependent system of which we are a part.

In summary, biomimicry, regenerative thinking, systemic thinking, and ecopsychology all strive to create more sustainable, resilient, and interconnected ways of living and thinking by drawing lessons from the natural world and emphasizing the deep interconnections within and between systems.

4 comments