How Many Crypto-Projects Can You Think of in Web3?

Audun Nilsen

13d ago (edited) in General discussion

I read that Toronto is creating two, no less, Crypto Towers, so to speak;

This smacks of the Twin Towers in NY City.

I envisage a shadow government, in the exact same way that the Twin Towers were.

We already know about BlackRock and Vanguard owning stakes in ... everywhere.

We already know the money powers will always end up with the big pile, regardless of price controls.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can we beat them to the punch?

I am seeing, at present, BitCoin as being deeply mired in techno-babble.

You have all the i´s dotted in terms of what money should be, meaning

Divisibility

Transportability

and all of this.

They also have

Safety (encryption)

Public ledgers

This is a double-edged sword, because it can be used

by criminals to hide, and

by tax collectors to show-case their proficiency in math.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Web3 is a term thrown around.

People say influencers aren´t going to make any money anymore.

Decentralized currencies, what is that?

I see the big problem with _fiat_, not so much that they

can be manipulated by money-grabbing politicians - on short notice, but that

they are military-curencies.

What Magna Carta was about was really that heathenism disappeared, because of the warm weather.

I´ll make this short and sweet.

France was, basically, deforested from 1000 AD to 1300 AD.

The Templars made travelling easy.

You could contract with people in a different continent (and maybe you were even related).

They had to go.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Internet is full of scammers. To be able to trust other people with your credit card information seems ludicrous to most people today, but crypto makes that completely feasible, because the court case would last 60 seconds.

This will be abused and disabused, which brings me to the point about this post.

Muhammad Afraz Sehole

Helium (HNT): Decentralized wireless network funded by the community.

DAO Tokens: Platforms like MolochDAO or Aragon allow communities to fund and vote on projects.

Giveth (GIV): A charity-focused platform using blockchain for transparent donations.

Rally (RLY) : Lets creators launch community tokens to fund projects or engage fans.

Do you see what I see?

I see Fundamental "trees" in a system of money, which is not connected to a government per se, because that form of government doesn´t exist today.

Picture this:

You decide to take a chance on a project to plant trees in the Gobi-desert, and ... nothing happens.

What is your surety that you get compensation?

There is always risk, but - if you have digital IDs ... and Social Credit Scores..? You know?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What happened after heathenism was that towns weren´t the money centres anymore. Bishops were given, exclusive, rights to mint money.

If you look at the money system, and go all the way - through to trusts (which is fancy way of saying contract), you will see that it is basically the Great Chain of Being (great reading, by the way). This is a hierarchy of (spiritual) authority which was made to give monies value (it came from the bishop, and he had a direct link to Rome).

Please, think about what I have written, and ... if you are in the mood, try to come up with more #TREES.

This is a small group, and when I look at the profiles, I see serious people.

My thought is that one could incubate ideas about the next level of crypto in small groups like this, and then launch what is, essentially, a papal money system, except it´s made for 2024.

Do you understand?

Bitcoin is the surety that no money-unit is counterfeit

Blockchaining is the surety that the money-units are public

#TREE-coining is the surety that the money-units are not squandered on frivolous projects

By that last statement, I mean that you can organize angel investors and footies on the ground, in a way that doesn´t involve bureaucracy so much at all.

Giving money to strangers is weird, and maybe not very healthy. Right?

In conclusion;

Envisage a tree, where BitCoin is the roots, the blockhains the trunk(s), and, then #RLY, #GIV, and #DAO the branches, on which you get smaller branches and leafs.

Makes sense?

For this million dollar-idea, I really just want the credit, and whatever pittance you see fit to throw my way :P

Really, though - think about it. It makes perfect sense, and ... instead of having one stock market like FOREX, which has, maybe, 25.000 different digital coins, all in a jumble, you launch a simple page organized around the tree. Right ?

You can filter by location, language, industry, but the essential part is that you do away with all of the copy cats - Trump was riding a wave of discontent from 2008 - the ultimate freeloader, right there in front of everybody, on TV every day now.

This aims philanthropy, and it makes applying for funding a lot more organized than doing a KickStart or GoFundMe, which seems like a MIRACLE, or something, when it could be just asking for money for a flower bed.

Thoughts ?

0 comments